Andreas Dilger wrote:
I'm not so strongly against ext4 that I won't follow that route if needed, but it essentially means that ext3 will be orphaned.
Not orphaned but scaled back over time. IMO there's only so much developer and brain and test bandwidth for "the main Linux filesystem."
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Sonny Rao <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>
- [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Prev by Date: Re: klibc
- Next by Date: Re: Light weight counter 1/1 Framework
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Index(es):
 |