On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:35:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: <snip> > All that being said, Linux's filesystems are looking increasingly crufty > and we are getting to the time where we would benefit from a greenfield > start-a-new-one. I'm curious about this comment; in what way are they _collectively_ looking crufty ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- References:
- [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Prev by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Index(es):
 |