Alex Tomas wrote:
Jeff Garzik (JG) writes:JG> No, there is a key difference between ext3 and SCSI/etc.: cruft is removed. JG> In ext3, old formats are supported for all eternity. we'd need this anyway. just to let users to migrate.
No, ext4 should remove some of the crufty old back-compat code. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Alex Tomas <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Alex Tomas <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Alex Tomas <[email protected]>
- [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Prev by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Index(es):
 |