Alex Tomas wrote:
what if proposed patch is safer than an average fix? (given that it's just out of usage unless enabled)
Regardless of how you phrase it, it is an inescapable fact that you are developing new stuff in the main, supposedly-stable Linux filesystem.
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Alex Tomas <[email protected]>
- [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Prev by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by Date: Re: Using netconsole for debugging suspend/resume
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Index(es):
 |