what if proposed patch is safer than an average fix?
(given that it's just out of usage unless enabled)
thanks, Alex
>>>>> Jeff Garzik (JG) writes:
JG> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On 6/9/06, Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> > I disagree completely... it would be an obvious win: people who want
>>> > stability get that, people who want new features get that too.
>>>
>>> And developers have a better outlet for their wacky developmental
>>> urges...
>>
>> And no real-world near-term progress is made for production users with
>> modern requirements. What you're advocating breeds instability in the
>> near-term.
JG> Constantly patching the main, "stable" Linux filesystem breeds
JG> instability today.
JG> Jeff
JG> _______________________________________________
JG> Ext2-devel mailing list
JG> [email protected]
JG> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
