Hi, "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]> writes: > I think that the main problem is that SYNCLINK wants to be able > to use some functions from hdlc_generic.c when > CONFIG_HDLC=m. How do you handle that? I don't :-) If CONFIG_HDLC=m then all hw drivers below can only be modules. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
- References:
- 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
- From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
- Index(es):
 |