Re: genirq

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> genirq-rename-desc-handler-to-desc-chip.patch
> genirq-rename-desc-handler-to-desc-chip-power-fix.patch
> genirq-rename-desc-handler-to-desc-chip-ia64-fix.patch
> genirq-rename-desc-handler-to-desc-chip-ia64-fix-2.patch
> genirq-sem2mutex-probe_sem-probing_active.patch
> genirq-cleanup-merge-irq_affinity-into-irq_desc.patch
> genirq-cleanup-remove-irq_descp.patch
> genirq-cleanup-remove-irq_descp-fix.patch
> genirq-cleanup-remove-fastcall.patch
> genirq-cleanup-misc-code-cleanups.patch
> genirq-cleanup-reduce-irq_desc_t-use-mark-it-obsolete.patch
> genirq-cleanup-include-linux-irqh.patch
> genirq-cleanup-merge-irq_dir-smp_affinity_entry-into-irq_desc.patch
> genirq-cleanup-merge-pending_irq_cpumask-into-irq_desc.patch
> genirq-cleanup-turn-arch_has_irq_per_cpu-into-config_irq_per_cpu.patch
> genirq-debug-better-debug-printout-in-enable_irq.patch
> genirq-add-retrigger-irq-op-to-consolidate-hw_irq_resend.patch
> genirq-doc-comment-include-linux-irqh-structures.patch
> genirq-doc-handle_irq_event-and-__do_irq-comments.patch
> genirq-cleanup-no_irq_type-cleanups.patch
> genirq-doc-add-design-documentation.patch
> genirq-add-genirq-sw-irq-retrigger.patch
> genirq-add-irq_noprobe-support.patch
> genirq-add-irq_norequest-support.patch
> genirq-add-irq_noautoen-support.patch
> genirq-update-copyrights.patch
> genirq-core.patch
> genirq-msi-fixes-2.patch
> genirq-add-irq-chip-support.patch
> genirq-add-irq-chip-support-fix.patch
> genirq-add-handle_bad_irq.patch
> genirq-add-irq-wake-power-management-support.patch
> genirq-add-sa_trigger-support.patch
> genirq-cleanup-no_irq_type-no_irq_chip-rename.patch
> genirq-convert-the-x86_64-architecture-to-irq-chips.patch
> genirq-convert-the-i386-architecture-to-irq-chips.patch
> genirq-convert-the-i386-architecture-to-irq-chips-fix-2.patch
> genirq-more-verbose-debugging-on-unexpected-irq-vectors.patch
> genirq-add-chip-eoi-fastack-fasteoi.patch
> genirq-add-chip-eoi-fastack-fasteoi-fix.patch
> 
>  Still stabilising.  It's looking more like 2.6.19 material.  Needs 
>  more review from arch maintainers too.

there hasnt been any real problem since the MSI one. The core bits are 
rather stable. The patch-queue had positive input from the maintainers 
of the two architectures with the most complex IRQ hardware (arm and 
ppc*), and that's reassuring. But in any case, other architectures are 
not affected at all (sans brow paperbag build bugs and typos), their 
__do_IRQ() handling remains unchanged. So i'd like to see this in 
2.6.18. (there a good deal of stuff we have ontop of genirq)

(the irqpoll discussions are unrelated to genirq - they are fixes for an 
irqpoll problem that the lock validator uncovered, and naturally those 
patches were ontop of genirq.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/