Re: [PATCH 2.6.16.16] sata_sil24: SII3124 sata driver endian problem

[Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>]

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Are there some other fields that should be marked?

Yeap, prot and rx_cnt of sil24_prb should also be marked __le.  Also, 
all fields of sil24_port_multiplier

Thanks.

> [PATCH] sata_sil24: endian annotations
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> ---
>
>  drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c |   14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>   * Port request block (PRB) 32 bytes
>   */
>  struct sil24_prb {
> -	u16	ctrl;
> +	__le16	ctrl;
>  	u16	prot;
>  	u32	rx_cnt;
>  	u8	fis[6 * 4];
> @@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ struct sil24_prb {
>   * Scatter gather entry (SGE) 16 bytes
>   */
>  struct sil24_sge {
> -	u64	addr;
> -	u32	cnt;
> -	u32	flags;
> +	__le64	addr;
> +	__le32	cnt;
> +	__le32	flags;
>  };
>  
>  /*

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/