Re: [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 01:17:19 -0700
"Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote on Saturday, June 03, 2006 1:11 AM
> > Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > looks really good now to me.
> > > 
> > >  Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > lets try it in -mm?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yup.  I redid Ken's patch against mainline and them mangled
> > lock-validator-special-locking-schedc.patch to suit.
> 
> Hmm, wish I knew this beforehand, so that I won't spend extra 1/2
> hour to port the patch to -mm and only to have you convert it back
> to mainline. I could just post the version I originally had against
> the mainline.
> 

Unless you're specifically working against code which is only in -mm (or a
subsystem tree), please work against mainline.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux