On Sat, May 27 2006, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Jens, ml
>
> I was wondering if cfq io priorities should be explicitly set to the realtime
> class when no io priority is specified from realtime tasks as in the
> following patch? (rt_task() will need to be modified to suit the PI changes in
> -mm)
Not sure. RT io needs to be considered carefully, but I guess so does RT
CPU scheduling. For now I'd prefer to play it a little safer, and only
inheric the priority value and not the class.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
