Re: [ck] [patch] cfq: ioprio inherit rt class

On Sat, May 27 2006, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Jens, ml
> 
> I was wondering if cfq io priorities should be explicitly set to the realtime 
> class when no io priority is specified from realtime tasks as in the 
> following patch? (rt_task() will need to be modified to suit the PI changes in
> -mm)

Not sure. RT io needs to be considered carefully, but I guess so does RT
CPU scheduling. For now I'd prefer to play it a little safer, and only
inheric the priority value and not the class.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] cfq: ioprio inherit rt class
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] cfq: ioprio inherit rt class
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUG](-mm)pci_disable_device function clear bars_enabled element
• Next by Date: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] cfq: ioprio inherit rt class
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] cfq: ioprio inherit rt class
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]