Well, if you don't want to enable a number of options, it's still better
to hide them completely. There are number of options by reorganizing the
debug menu a little, it only depends if we're talking here are about a -mm
only crutch or something which might be useful to more than a handful of
people. A few extra config options are not really a problem as long as
they are logically grouped together (instead of having to enable random
options all over the place).
How is the user meant to know which of your config options a particular
option is hidden under?
Same question for the developer as to where to put it?
Seems there are two isses - whether the naming is meaningful or not,
and whether you want to hide options under other options,or just flip
defaults ... does that sound correct?
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]