Re: [PATCH] klibc

Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:

On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Bob Picco wrote:

-#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)

+#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) && \
+	!defined(__powerpc64__)

Why not just !defined(__LP64__) ?

_BITSIZE == 64 is really the right formula... if I remember correctly, there were some 64-bit platforms (Alpha?) which didn't conform, though. I will look at this later today.

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] klibc
    • From: maximilian attems <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] klibc
    • From: "Bob Picco" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] klibc
    • From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] cramfs corruption after BLKFLSBUF on loop device
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] klibc
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] klibc
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]