On Thu, 01 June 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Bob Picco wrote:
> >>
> >> -#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
> >> +#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) && \
> >> + !defined(__powerpc64__)
> >
> > Why not just !defined(__LP64__) ?
>
> _BITSIZE == 64 is really the right formula... if I remember correctly, there were some
> 64-bit platforms (Alpha?) which didn't conform, though. I will look at this later today.
>
> -hpa
indeed aboves line contains an mistake by an earlier patch of mine.
-#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
+#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__arch64__)
is atm needed to get statfs right on sparc.
--
maks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
