Evgeniy, On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > Since pseudo-randomness affects both folded and not folded hash > distribution, it can not end up in different results. Yes it would, so to rule out pseudo-random effects the pseudo- random number generator must be removed. > > You are right that having test with 2^48 values is really interesting, > but it will take ages on my test machine :) Try a usable subset; no pseudo-random number generator. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- References:
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Prev by Date: Re: Adaptive Readahead V14 - statistics question...
- Next by Date: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Next by thread: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Index(es):
 |