Re: Adaptive Readahead V14 - statistics question...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:51:43 +0800 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:50:21PM +0200, Voluspa wrote:
> > _Massive READ_
> > 
> > [/usr had some 490000 files]
> > 
> > "cd /usr ; time find . -type f -exec md5sum {} \;"
> > 
> > 2.6.17-rc5 ------- 2.6.17-rc5-ar
> > 
> > real 21m21.009s -- 21m37.663s
> > user 3m20.784s  -- 3m20.701s
> > sys  6m34.261s  -- 6m41.735s
> > 
> > I had planned to run this at least three times, but didn't realize I had
> > 12 compiled kernel trees and 3 uncompiled there... So, a one-shot had to
> > do. But it's still significant.
> 
> Sorry, it is a known regression. I'd like to fix it in the next
> release.

That's cool. I had fun testing (I'm weird) and now have a fixed procedure
to monitor your future work. When/if it hits mainline I'll both back it out
and switch it on/off. Then shout WOLF if I see a regression anywhere ;)

There's still the readahead size to adjust. I'll return with my findings.

Mvh
Mats Johannesson
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux