Re: usb-serial ipaq kernel problem

[Frank Gevaerts <frank.gevaerts@fks.be>]

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 06:10:42PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2006 23:36:35 +0200
> Frank Gevaerts <frank.gevaerts@fks.be> wrote:
> 
> | On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 05:52:08PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
> | > On Tue, 30 May 2006 19:48:21 +0200
> | > Frank Gevaerts <frank.gevaerts@fks.be> wrote:
> | > 
> | > | On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:53:29AM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
> | > | > On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:38:01 -0300
> | > | > "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> wrote:
> | > | > 
> | > | >  If it ran _before_ the timeout expires with no timeout error it does not
> | > | > depend. Then we can do the simpler solution: just kill the read urb in the
> | > | > ipaq_open's error path.
> | > | 
> | > | That seems to work.
> | > | I also found that both the return in ipaq_write_bulk_callback and the
> | > | flush_scheduled_work() in destroy_serial() are needed to get rid of the
> | > | usb_serial_disconnect() bug.
> | > 
> | >  Then did you hit it with my patch?
> | > 
> | >  I'm just worried with the fact that you're hitting it with every
> | > proposed fix. Maybe it's something else.
> | 
> | I'm hitting it with either of the proposed fixes, but not when both are
> | applied.
> 
>  Is this still true? :)

Yes. It's still running, with about 2000 disconnects since the last
boot.

Frank

> 
> -- 
> Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino

-- 
Frank Gevaerts                                 frank.gevaerts@fks.be
fks bvba - Formal and Knowledge Systems        http://www.fks.be/
Stationsstraat 108                             Tel:  ++32-(0)11-21 49 11
B-3570 ALKEN                                   Fax:  ++32-(0)11-22 04 19
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/