Quoting Diego Calleja <[email protected]>:
> That leaves another question that I (a poor user) may have missed: Why is
> adaptive read-ahead compile-time configurable instead of completely
> replacing
> the old system?
That was done to appease the users out there that had worse performance with it.
In the early stages of development of this code it was rather detrimental on an
ordinary desktop. Fortunately that seems to have gotten a lot better. I don't
think the final version should be a compile time option. It's either "adaptive"
and better everywhere or it's not.
--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
