El Sat, 27 May 2006 10:08:41 +1000,
Con Kolivas <[email protected]> escribió:
> On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:00, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Sorry I should have been clearer. The belief is that certain infrastructure
> components do not benefit from a pluggable framework, and readeahead probably
> comes under that description. It's not like Linus was implying we should only
> have one filesystem for example, since filesystems are afterall pluggable
> features.
That leaves another question that I (a poor user) may have missed: Why is
adaptive read-ahead compile-time configurable instead of completely replacing
the old system?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
