Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts

[Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>]

On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 09:05, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Don't save the framebuffer. Just send a message to the client
> > application saying "fb is corrupted, please redraw". X11 can do it,
> > console can do it.
> >   
> Sure, X has no problem doing an expose event on the entire screen.
> But then the kernel would need a way to tell X that the display
> was invalidated outside its control.  Is there even an
> API for that today?
> 
> The problem isn't trivial, for the machine may be running
> quite a few xservers.  Or some other sort of software
> that uses the framebuffer.  (libsvga, y, berlin, ...)

I'd say send something simple (SIGWINCH?) to all apps opening fbdev, and
for legacy apps (e.g. current Xorg) use an userspace helper listening to
this signal and sending X (or Y or Berlin) an expose event (perhaps
after waiting for the proper input device, depending on some policy).

Otherwise I like much your other idea of allocating memory by freeing
non-dirty pages if possible, but that doesn't solve the problem that the
restoration of the previous state (or the expose event) has to wait for
user input or a timeout or something. That kind of decision belongs to
userspace.

	Xav


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/