Re: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem

Chris Leech <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +	for_each_cpu(i)

That's about to be deleted.  Please use for_each_possible_cpu().

That's if for_each_possible_cpu() is appropriate.  Perhaps it should be
using for_each_present_cpu(), or for_each_online_cpu().  That's why
for_each_cpu() is going away - to make people think about such things..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
    • From: Nathan Lynch <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/9] I/OAT repost
    • From: Chris Leech <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
    • From: Chris Leech <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: A couple of oops.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]