Re: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Chris Leech <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +	for_each_cpu(i)
> 
> That's about to be deleted.  Please use for_each_possible_cpu().
> 
> That's if for_each_possible_cpu() is appropriate.

It is -- those loops traverse chan->local, which is alloc_percpu'd,
which allocates for all possible cpus.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/9] I/OAT repost
    • From: Chris Leech <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
    • From: Chris Leech <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.
• Next by Date: Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]