Re: [patch 2/3] vdso: improve print_fatal_signals support by adding memory maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
static void print_fatal_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int signr)
 {
@@ -781,9 +870,13 @@ static void print_fatal_signal(struct pt
 			printk("%02x ", insn);
 		}
 	}
-#endif
 	printk("\n");
+	if (current->mm)
+		printk("vDSO at %p\n", current->mm->context.vdso);
+#endif
 	show_regs(regs);
+	printk("\n");
+	print_vmas();
 }
static int __init setup_print_fatal_signals(char *str

Perhaps I should have read your first patch more carefully - it did have register info. This looks even better (although you may now want to allow it to be #ifdef'd out under CONFIG_EMBEDDED).

You probably should use PATH_MAX+1 instead of SIZE or check IS_ERR() on the string from d_path.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux