Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory

Sam Vilain wrote:

>Sam Vilain wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I didn't grab uts_sem.  That semaphore could be made per-uts_ns, in
>>theory.  Whether anyone cares about contention that much is another
>>question.
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>FWIW, the uts_sem isn't mentioned anywhere in the
>/proc/sys/kernel/osname sysctl, either.  So that interface probably
>isn't safe on SMP/preempt.
>  
>

No, there it is, in proc_doutsstring.  I didn't parse the "doutsstring"
as "do_uts_string".

Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
  - From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
  - From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
  - From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: nmi_watchdog default setting on i386 and x86_64
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH (try #2)] mm: avoid unnecessary OOM kills
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]