Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory

Sam Vilain wrote:

>I didn't grab uts_sem.  That semaphore could be made per-uts_ns, in
>theory.  Whether anyone cares about contention that much is another
>question.
>  
>

FWIW, the uts_sem isn't mentioned anywhere in the
/proc/sys/kernel/osname sysctl, either.  So that interface probably
isn't safe on SMP/preempt.

Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
    • From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
    • From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
    • From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
• Next by Date: Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]