Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls

* Andi Kleen ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 22:59, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > Recent discussions about whether to print a message about unimplemented
> > ia32 syscalls on x86_64 have missed the real bug: the number of ia32
> > syscalls is wrong in 2.6.16.  Fixing that kills the message.
> 
> There is already a slightly different patch for this in the FF tree.

OK, if there's smth you think is good for -stable, just send it over.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
• Next by Date: Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
• Previous by thread: Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
• Next by thread: Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]