Recent discussions about whether to print a message about unimplemented
ia32 syscalls on x86_64 have missed the real bug: the number of ia32
syscalls is wrong in 2.6.16. Fixing that kills the message.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
--- 2.6.16.17-64.orig/include/asm-x86_64/ia32_unistd.h
+++ 2.6.16.17-64/include/asm-x86_64/ia32_unistd.h
@@ -317,6 +317,6 @@
#define __NR_ia32_ppoll 309
#define __NR_ia32_unshare 310
-#define IA32_NR_syscalls 315 /* must be > than biggest syscall! */
+#define IA32_NR_syscalls 311 /* must be > than biggest syscall! */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_64_IA32_UNISTD_H_ */
--
Chuck
"The x86 isn't all that complex -- it just doesn't make a lot of sense."
-- Mike Johnson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
