Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)

On Monday 22 May 2006 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
> These are the x86_64-specific pieces to enable reliable stack traces. The
> only restriction with this is that it currently cannot unwind across the
> interrupt->normal stack boundary, as that transition is lacking proper
> annotation.

that comment should be outdated now? 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/6] reliable stack trace support (x86-64 IRQ stack adjustment)
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]