Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)

On Monday 22 May 2006 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
> These are the x86_64-specific pieces to enable reliable stack traces. The
> only restriction with this is that it currently cannot unwind across the
> interrupt->normal stack boundary, as that transition is lacking proper
> annotation.

that comment should be outdated now? 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] namespaces: uts_ns: make information visible via /proc/PID/uts directory
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/6] reliable stack trace support (x86-64 IRQ stack adjustment)
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]