Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)

>>> Andi Kleen <[email protected]> 22.05.06 16:08 >>>
>On Monday 22 May 2006 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> These are the x86_64-specific pieces to enable reliable stack traces. The
>> only restriction with this is that it currently cannot unwind across the
>> interrupt->normal stack boundary, as that transition is lacking proper
>> annotation.
>
>that comment should be outdated now? 

Yes, if you consider the patches as a group (since the change that fixes this is in a later patch I wasn't really sure
how to deal with that part of the description).

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Remove readv/writev methods and use aio_read/aio_write instead
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (i386)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/6] reliable stack trace support (x86-64 IRQ stack adjustment)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]