On Sun, 21 May 2006, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, 20 May 2006 05:41:03 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc4/2.6.17-rc4-mm2/
>
> secmark-add-new-packet-controls-to-selinux.patch looks fishy:
>
> --- devel/security/selinux/Kconfig~secmark-add-new-packet-controls-to-selinux 2006
> -05-18 03:04:58.000000000 -0700
> +++ devel-akpm/security/selinux/Kconfig 2006-05-18 03:04:58.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> config SECURITY_SELINUX
> bool "NSA SELinux Support"
> - depends on SECURITY_NETWORK && AUDIT && NET && INET
> + depends on SECURITY_NETWORK && AUDIT && NET && INET && NETWORK_SECMARK
> default n
> help
> This selects NSA Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux).
>
> Was it *really* intended that SELINUX not be selectable if NETWORK_SECMARK
> isn't present?
Yes, it's required for SELinux.
- James
--
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
