On Sat, 20 May 2006 05:41:03 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc4/2.6.17-rc4-mm2/ secmark-add-new-packet-controls-to-selinux.patch looks fishy: --- devel/security/selinux/Kconfig~secmark-add-new-packet-controls-to-selinux 2006 -05-18 03:04:58.000000000 -0700 +++ devel-akpm/security/selinux/Kconfig 2006-05-18 03:04:58.000000000 -0700 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ config SECURITY_SELINUX bool "NSA SELinux Support" - depends on SECURITY_NETWORK && AUDIT && NET && INET + depends on SECURITY_NETWORK && AUDIT && NET && INET && NETWORK_SECMARK default n help This selects NSA Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux). Was it *really* intended that SELINUX not be selectable if NETWORK_SECMARK isn't present?
Attachment:
pgpXkJjN8bZYo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.17-rc4-mm2
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc4-mm2
- References:
- 2.6.17-rc4-mm2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.17-rc4-mm2
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] i386, vdso=[0|1] boot option and /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.17-rc4-mm2 (hard lockup after resume from disk on AMD64)
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.17-rc4-mm2
- Index(es):
 |