On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 22:55 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Then we still get the inconsistency of device names changing as
> drivers
> are loaded. I think we should declare it a bug for devices to not be
> on a bus. The only example I have of devices not-on-a-bus are scsi
> targets. I would propose introducing a new scsi_target bus for them,
> then removing the 'target' from the start of the bus_id. Adding them
> to
> the scsi bus looks like it'd be a lot of work.
It's not just the target. All the intermediate devices in transport
classes don't have busses either. The only reason scsi_device has a
bus is so we can use the driver model to bind the ULDs.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
