Re: dev_printk output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 22:55 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Then we still get the inconsistency of device names changing as
> drivers
> are loaded.  I think we should declare it a bug for devices to not be
> on a bus.  The only example I have of devices not-on-a-bus are scsi
> targets.  I would propose introducing a new scsi_target bus for them,
> then removing the 'target' from the start of the bus_id.  Adding them
> to
> the scsi bus looks like it'd be a lot of work.

It's not just the target.  All the intermediate devices in transport
classes don't have busses either.   The only reason scsi_device has a
bus is so we can use the driver model to bind the ULDs.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux