On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:28:47PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:11:42PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:09:57PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> > > Funky how loading sd after sg changes the output ... and using the driver
> > > name as a prefix sometimes messes this up for scsi.
> > >
> > > 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
> > > sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
> >
> > I find that a bit confusing too. Obviously, we should distinguish
> > different kinds of bus_id from each other somehow -- but isn't the
> > obvious thing to use the bus name? That must already be unique as sysfs
> > relies on it. ie this patch:
>
> Yes, not all devices are on a bus, so this will not work. And we want
> to know the driver that controls the device too. So how about adding
> the bus if it's not null?
>
> Something like (untested):
> printk(level "%s %s %s: " format , (dev)->bus ? (dev)->bus->name : "", (dev)->driver ? (dev)->driver->name : "", (dev)->bus_id , ## arg)
Then we still get the inconsistency of device names changing as drivers
are loaded. I think we should declare it a bug for devices to not be
on a bus. The only example I have of devices not-on-a-bus are scsi
targets. I would propose introducing a new scsi_target bus for them,
then removing the 'target' from the start of the bus_id. Adding them to
the scsi bus looks like it'd be a lot of work.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
