[email protected] (Mel Gorman) wrote:
>
> I am struggling to see how the alignment patches or
> arch-independent-zone-sizing would clobber the mapping of the ACPI table :(
hm. Well something did it ;)
> > I also managed to provoke "Too many memory regions,
> > truncating" out of it.
> >
>
> "Too many memory regions, truncating" is of concern because memory will be
> effectively lost. Is this on x86_64 as well? If so, I need to submit a
> patch that sets CONFIG_MAX_ACTIVE_REGIONS to 128 on x86_64 which is the
> same value of E820MAX. This is similar to what PPC64 does for LMB regions
> (see MAX_ACTIVE_REGIONS in arch/powerpc/Kconfig for example). If it's not
> x86_64, what arch does it occur on?
Yes, it's x86_64. It kind of went away though. I seem to have been
finding various .config combinations which cause x86_64 to die horridly -
that was one.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
