>> The kernel already drives the files system, the
>> network, the cdrom, the cpu, etc. Why not the graphics
>> ?
>>
> See above! I also explained that in the previous email.
> But since you are slow at getting things,
> here it is again:
>
> Kernel graphichs are more dangerous than root graphichs, so
> you only make the security flaws worse by moving it into the kernel.
What about framebuffer, dri and agpgart? Does that belong to
"graphics"? Because it's "in" the kernel... (or am I just missing
something?)
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
