Hi Hans Peter,
H. Peter Anvin wrote
> ENOIOCTLCMD is right here, *except* in the very last hunk, because
> it's a request to the upper layers to emulate the operation:
So would a patch like this be welcome and clear this up?
diff --git a/include/linux/errno.h b/include/linux/errno.h
index d90b80f..d33ae4b 100644
--- a/include/linux/errno.h
+++ b/include/linux/errno.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#define ERESTARTSYS 512
#define ERESTARTNOINTR 513
#define ERESTARTNOHAND 514 /* restart if no handler.. */
-#define ENOIOCTLCMD 515 /* No ioctl command */
+#define ENOIOCTLCMD 515 /* No ioctl command, upper layer please emulate or pass ENOTTY to user space */
#define ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK 516 /* restart by calling sys_restart_syscall */
/* Defined for the NFSv3 protocol */
Regards
Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]