--- [email protected] a écrit :
> I think it adequately demonstrates that you're
> unable to distinguish
> between problems that *a specific implementation of
> X* has, and problems
> that *the X system as a design* has. If one
> particular X server has
> a misfeature, the correct fix is to fix the server
> software.
Didnt I already write about all this before ?
We should fix X.org (root, hardware access) problems.
But fixing only X.org is not enough.
X implementations problems :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System#Limitations_and_criticisms_of_X
http://www.std.org/~msm/common/protocol.pdf
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-03/0987.html
http://cbbrowne.com/info/xbloat.html
> So if you want to fix the *problem*, go learn enough
> about graphics to
> actually help design an open, non-evil chipset.
> That's the *real* problem,
> not whatever fantasized shortcomings of X itself
> you're trolling about.
One example : Tech Source company is trying to do an
open-source graphic cards.
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
I would be happy that Nvidia or ATI open their
drivers.
Regards
___________________________________________________________________________
Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver directement vos services préférés : vérifiez vos nouveaux mails, lancez vos recherches et suivez l'actualité en temps réel.
Rendez-vous sur http://fr.yahoo.com/set
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
