Re: replacing X Window System !

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Subject: Re: replacing X Window System !
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:14:25 -0400
Cc: linux cbon <[email protected]>, Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>, [email protected]
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 May 2006 11:09:38 EDT." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:09:38 EDT, [email protected] said:

> Totalling it up: 
> 11984127 359976   85608 12429711
> 
> Yowza.  124 *meg*.

12.4 (slipped a decimal pint). But still.

> > But that would greatly simplify the whole system.

> Yeah, adding 124 meg to a 4.2M kernel will simplify it...

Still quadruples the size and even worse on complexity...

Attachment: pgpqi6IS3kbX5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: replacing X Window System !
  - From: linux cbon <[email protected]>
- Re: replacing X Window System !
  - From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: replacing X Window System !
  - From: linux cbon <[email protected]>
- Re: replacing X Window System !
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: help booting from SATA in 2.4.32.. initrd not loading
Next by Date: klibc build broken on UML
Previous by thread: Re: replacing X Window System !
Next by thread: Re: replacing X Window System !
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux