Re: [PATCH] x86 NUMA panic compile error

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> > (which has nothing to do with x86_64 anyway)
> 
> True.
> 
> I guess the concern here is that we don't want people building these 
> frankenkernels and then sending us bug reports against them.

sure - lets simply turn it into a printk, as per the patch below.

it's not like we are being swamped with these bugreports, it seems i was 
the only one who tried. So lets not over-react it. (and the panic was 
the worst possible thing we could do.)

	Ingo

---

warn users that running CONFIG_NUMA on non-x440 boxes is barely tested.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

 arch/i386/kernel/srat.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c
@@ -267,12 +267,9 @@ int __init get_memcfg_from_srat(void)
 	int i = 0;
 
 	extern int use_cyclone;
-	if (use_cyclone == 0) {
-		/* Make sure user sees something */
-		static const char s[] __initdata = "Not an IBM x440/NUMAQ. Don't use i386 CONFIG_NUMA anywhere else."
-		early_printk(s);
-		panic(s);
-	}
+	/* Make sure user sees something */
+	if (use_cyclone == 0)
+		printk(KERN_WARN "WARNING: Not an IBM x440/NUMAQ and CONFIG_NUMA enabled!\n");
 
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_find_root_pointer(ACPI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESSING,
 						rsdp_address))) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/