* Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]> wrote:
> if (use_cyclone == 0) {
> /* Make sure user sees something */
> - static const char s[] __initdata = "Not an IBM x440/NUMAQ. Don't use i386 CONFIG_NUMA anywhere else."
> + static const char s[] __initdata = "Not an IBM x440/NUMAQ. Don't use i386 CONFIG_NUMA anywhere else.";
> early_printk(s);
> panic(s);
> }
i still strongly oppose the original Andi hack... numerous reasons were
given not to apply it (it's nice to simulate/trigger rarer features on
mainstream hardware too, and this ability to boot NUMA on my flat x86
testbox found at least one other NUMA bug already). Furthermore, the
crash i reported was fixed by the NUMA patchset. Andrew, please drop:
x86_64-mm-i386-numa-summit-check.patch
(which has nothing to do with x86_64 anyway)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
