Re: [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes

Ingo Molnar wrote:

* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
There's some possibility here of interaction with Mel's "patchset tosize zones and memory holes in an architecture-independent manner." Ijammed them together - let's see how it goes.
update: Andy's 3 patches, applied to 2.6.17-rc3-mm1, fixed all thecrashes and asserts i saw. NUMA-on-x86 is now rock-solid on my testbox.Great work Andy!


Excellent. I think these should get into 2.6.17, and possibly even the
-stable series.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com-

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes
  - From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Silly bitmap size accounting fix
Next by Date: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/2] Zone boundary alignment fixes cleanups
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]