Re: [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes

* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> There's some possibility here of interaction with Mel's "patchset to 
> size zones and memory holes in an architecture-independent manner." I 
> jammed them together - let's see how it goes.

update: Andy's 3 patches, applied to 2.6.17-rc3-mm1, fixed all the 
crashes and asserts i saw. NUMA-on-x86 is now rock-solid on my testbox. 
Great work Andy!

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes
    • From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 13/14] FS-Cache: Release page->private in failed readahead [try #8]
• Next by Date: Re: Segfault on the i386 enter instruction
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Zone boundry alignment fixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]