On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 04:38 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Are there any users of swp_entry_t when CONFIG_SWAP is not defined?
>
> Well there shouldn't be. Making accesses to swp_entry_t.val fail to
> compile if !CONFIG_SWAP might be useful.
In mm/vmscan.c line 387 it defined swp_entry_t and sets val regardless
of CONFIG_SWAP , but the value never really gets used .. Showed up in my
warning reviews.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
