Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Are there any users of swp_entry_t when CONFIG_SWAP is not defined?
Well there shouldn't be. Making accesses to swp_entry_t.val fail to
compile if !CONFIG_SWAP might be useful.
> +/*
> + * A swap entry has to fit into a "unsigned long", as
> + * the entry is hidden in the "index" field of the
> + * swapper address space.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> typedef struct {
> unsigned long val;
> } swp_entry_t;
> +#else
> +typedef struct {
> + unsigned long val;
> +} swp_entry_t __attribute__((__unused__));
> +#endif
We have __attribute_used__, which hides a gcc oddity.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
