Re: [PATCH] Document futex PI design

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:59:49AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> +lock	 - In this document from now on, the term lock and spin lock will
> +	   be synonymous.  These are locks that are used for SMP as well
> +	   as turning off preemption to protect areas of code on SMP machines.
Should the last SMP be UP?

--
			Gleb.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH -mm 00/02] update to Document futex PI design
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Document futex PI design
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Document futex PI design
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Document futex PI design
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Document futex PI design
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Document futex PI design
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Document futex PI design
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: rt20 patch question
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/9] nsproxy: incorporate fs namespace
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document futex PI design
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document futex PI design
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]