Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 20:25 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > No - it would only make sense if it could be used for all slabs. 
> > Otherwise: How should kfree figure out if it's called for a slab with 
> > embedded pointers or not?

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 22:05 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> We certainly can support both by virtualizing kfree() and
> kmem_cache_free() with struct slab_operations type of thing

Uhm, not for kfree(), obviously. I was thinking of kmem_cache_free().

			Pekka

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] VIA quirk fixup, additional PCI IDs
• Next by Date: Re: [stable] Re: Linux 2.6.16.14
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]