From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
The comment states: 'Setting a tag on a not-present item is a BUG.'
Hence if 'index' is larger than the maxindex; the item _cannot_
be presen; it should also be a BUG.
Also, this allows the following statement (assume a fresh tree):
radix_tree_tag_set(root, 16, 1);
to fail silently, but when preceded by:
radix_tree_insert(root, 32, item);
it would BUG, because the height has been extended by the insert.
In neither case was 16 present.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
lib/radix-tree.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/lib/radix-tree.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/lib/radix-tree.c 2006-04-07 10:54:43.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/lib/radix-tree.c 2006-04-28 17:56:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -365,8 +365,7 @@ void *radix_tree_tag_set(struct radix_tr
struct radix_tree_node *slot;
height = root->height;
- if (index > radix_tree_maxindex(height))
- return NULL;
+ BUG_ON(index > radix_tree_maxindex(height))
shift = (height - 1) * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
slot = root->rnode;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]