On Friday 28 April 2006 22:07, MAEDA Naoaki wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > I agree with Mike here. It's either global resource management or it
> > isn't. If one user is using all interactive tasks and the other user none
> > it's unfair resource management.
>
> My intention was not to hurt interactive task's response, but it seems
> that just ignoring interactive tasks is not good. I'll consider
> regulating interactive tasks also.
I appreciate the gesture of concern over interactive tasks :-) Unfortunately
it doesn't change the fact that interactive tasks can also consume large
proportions of the resources, and that any interactivity estimator will get
it wrong on occasion and flag a non interactive task as interactive.
--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
