On Fri, 2006-04-28 08:00:17 -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm fairly sure that if header structure members were renamed (one > patch at a time), and were renamed sanely (like struct class should not > be renamed to struct TheyDidntKnowAnything)... and sanely also means > trying to have the same length like (struct klass)...and if every file *cough* This is the Linux Kernel, not a KDE application... MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- RE: C++ pushback
- From: Matthew Frost <[email protected]>
- RE: C++ pushback
- From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>
- Re: C++ pushback
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
- Re: C++ pushback
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: C++ pushback
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: C++ pushback
- From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: C++ pushback
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: C++ pushback
- From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[email protected]>
- RE: C++ pushback
- Prev by Date: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [RFC] PATCH 0/4 - Time virtualization
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] change gen_pool allocator to not touch managed memory
- Previous by thread: Re: C++ pushback
- Next by thread: Re: C++ pushback
- Index(es):