Re: C++ pushback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:09:38PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The real problem with C++ for kernel modules is:
> 
>  - the language just sucks. Sorry, but it does.
>  - some of the C features we use may or may not be usable from C++ 
>    (statement expressions?)
>  - the compilers are slower, and less reliable. This is _less_ of an issue 
>    these days than it used to be (at least the reliability part), but it's 
>    still true.
>  - a lot of the C++ features just won't be supported sanely (ie the kernel 
>    infrastructure just doesn't do exceptions for C++, nor will it run any 
>    static constructors etc).

   - a lot of C++ advocates agree that some subset could be used sanely,
     but there's no agreement as to _which_ subset would that be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux