Re: [PATCH -mm] W1_CON: add W1 to depends

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:21:31PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap ([email protected]) wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> 
> W1_CON should depend on W1 also.

I have no problem with the patch, but does dependency absence introduce
some problems? This config option is only used when w1 is enabled.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH -mm] W1_CON: add W1 to depends
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH -mm] W1_CON: add W1 to depends
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: CLONE_NEWNS and mount command?
• Next by Date: Re: CLONE_NEWNS and mount command?
• Previous by thread: [PATCH -mm] W1_CON: add W1 to depends
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] W1_CON: add W1 to depends
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]